Book Club: The Man Who Couldn’t Eat

Image via booksparkspr.com

I think that it’s pretty clear where my reading priorities lie. I love juicy historical fiction, preferably set in England or France, with lots of pages chock full of scheming and treacherous wanna-be royalty. I like books that require me to look at the family tree at the beginning of the novel. I like books that force me to read with my search engine as my companion so that I can check facts. I love books that give me a new castle to visit.

That’s why it was kind of surprising how much I loved The Man Who Couldn’t Eat. At its heart, it is just a simple tale of a man who loves food but is forced to go NPO — nothing by mouth — for three months so that complications from his Crohn’s disease can heal. Jon Reiner’s narrative is truly gripping as he leads the reader through his love of food and the relationships he has established around food. We feel personally the devastation that comes with living a life without going out for breakfast at the local diner, or having Thanksgiving dinner, or even just being able to pick up street food from his neighborhood food truck.

The Man Who Couldn’t Eat is also a lesson in self-discipline; I’m not surprised that there were times he was ready to give up and considered suicide as an alternative to his chronic illness. Reiner’s home life suffered throughout his ordeal; he had been the stay-at-home-dad and the main cook for his family because his wife had to keep her job as a teacher in order to maintain insurance coverage. His young children and his wife are emotional victims of Crohn’s disease along with the physical devastation experienced by Reiner. The Man Who Couldn’t Eat is a vivid look at how much a family’s central core can be damaged by chronic illness. Yet, he lived through the deprivation and emerged to tell his story in a way that will keep the reader fully engaged and unable to stop reading.

JON REINER won the 2010 James Beard Foundation Award for Magazine Feature Writing with Recipes for the collaborative Esquire article “How Men Eat.” His memoir, The Man Who Couldn’t Eat, is based on an acclaimed article of the same name that he wrote for Esquire in 2009. He lives in New York City with his wife and two children (amazon.com).

Leap Day — An Opportunity to Reflect and Renew

Leap Day - February 29th

Leap Day - February 29th (Photo credit: Cameron Maddux)

It’s Leap Day, a day that only occurs once every four years. In addition to being an indicator of the ridiculousness of our calendar, it also seems a good time to take stock of the cycles of our lives.

Where was I four years ago?

I had good relationships with my husband and adult children.

I was at the same job.

I weighed about the same.

I lived in the same house.

I went to the same church.

I had mostly the same friends.

Come to think of it, I had pretty much the same wonderful life that I have now.

With the exception of  the issues with “stuff” management and my constant battle with weight, I’m pretty happy with my life. And then there’s the problem with being a teacher in this crazy world-turned-upside-down-hate-the-teachers environment, but that will pass.

And how is my world different?

We lost four parents and that’s a pothole I can’t fix come spring.

I’ve been to England three times and France once in the last four years. I’ve been waiting my whole life for my shot at Europe.

I am truly leaps and bounds beyond where I was in social media four years ago. And technology — how did I ever live without my smart phone?

The older we get the better we are — isn’t that conventional wisdom?

Despite the outward appearance of a static life, in reality I’m a changed person. I hope 2016 finds me even healthier, wiser, and is it too much to ask to also be wealthier? And by that I mean real money — dollars — dinero — Euros. I’ll take it all.

The End. Happy Leap Day to you! I hope that Google doesn’t arrest me for copyright infringement, but I’m not selling anything and it was just so darn cute.

Image credit: Google

Book Club: Pull

Over the past few years, I have watched a member of my church carry around a yellow legal pad, scribbling and scribbling. I don’t know her very well, and I never took the initiative to ask what she was writing. Maybe it wasn’t any of my business.

To my surprise, her scribblings turned out to be a novel which actually got published. Popular reviews on amazon.com were positive and we wanted to support our friend, so our church book club decided to choose Pull for one of our monthly titles.

Pull by B.A. Binns tells the story of an African-American teenager who has lost his bearings due to his mother’s death at the hands of his abusive father, a death which he feels he might have prevented. Since Dad is in jail, David and his two sisters are reluctantly taken in by a relative, rather than separating the family in foster care. The kids move to a city neighborhood where their aunt lives, and David leaves his high school basketball stardom behind to go to an inner city high school where his attempts to remain anonymous are thwarted by relationships with both students and faculty. In order to help support the family, after school he works for a construction firm, where he finds satisfaction and pride in his new-found competency.

It’s not a good story without conflict, and Binns creates a compelling tale about how David and his siblings negotiate making a new start in a foreign environment. As with most teenagers, David’s story revolves around his preoccupation with a beautiful girl and his testosterone-infused competition with another male student. I was engaged immediately and read the whole book in two sittings.

Pull is a realistic look at what teenagers in urban schools deal with on a daily basis and I recommend it for readers in high school and beyond. It’s gritty and has overt sexuality, so don’t be surprised or offended by its frank look at a boy’s view of the world. I think that Barbara Binns has done an excellent job writing in a male voice, and I would go out on a limb to say that Pull is similar to The Outsiders in its contemporary message.

As with most authors, it turns out that this isn’t Binns’s first novel; she has written others that have yet to be published. I look forward to reading them.

Book Club: Velocity

Image via bookbanter.wordpress.com

In a direct sequel to Crush, which I reviewed on my 2011 Book List, Velocity continues the story of FBI profiler Agent Karen Vail’s search for her missing lover, Roberto Hernandez. After having been on what she understood to be a vacation in Napa Valley wine country with her boyfriend, she finds out that his disappearance is actually linked to his undercover work with the Drug Enforcement Agency and the FBI. The chase takes Karen and the reader from Napa to FBI headquarters in Quantico, Virginia, and on to  drug hideouts in San Diego and Las Vegas. It’s a dizzying story of one of America’s dirty secrets, and really highlights how much we civilians don’t know about the drug trade which is going on right under our noses.

Author Alan Jacobson has actively researched and trained with law enforcement professionals and has used experience to inform his Karen Vail novels. Although I’ve read two of the Karen Vail books, I chose the first one because I was hoping to find a story set in Napa Valley. Jacobson seems to be as careful about his setting research and development as he is about his cop research, but I found that his heroine Karen Vail sets my teeth on edge. Her on-the-edge-of legality behaviors don’t resonate well with me; she seems hysterically determined to take matters into her own hands despite what protocol and common sense would indicate. Of course, it wouldn’t be a thriller if she didn’t get her man in the end, but it makes me shudder to think that there are actually cops out there behaving in such risky ways.

If you are a fan of Criminal Minds on television, you will find this story right up your alley.

Hiatus (or the proverbial brick wall)

English: Brick Wall, Moot Gardens, Downton Dow...

Image via Wikipedia

You know how they say, “If you have nothing good to say, don’t talk”? That’s me right now.

You don’t want to hear about my work woes, my weight woes, or my house woes, and I don’t really want to write about them.

I promise; I’ll be back after hiatus.

After all, if we can wait for eleven months for more Downton Abbey, I know that I can get it back in a shorter amount of time than that. Not that I’m nearly as engrossing as Downton, but you get the idea.

XOXO
Jennie

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Louisa Challenge: Little Women

Illustration from: An Old-Fashioned Girl. By L...

Image via Wikipedia

Welcome to the second installment of The Louisa Challenge where we read one Louisa May Alcott book every month and then discuss it. You can find the prompts here. If you wrote a post yourself, please link it up in your comments so that we can all read your work!

I was watching Midnight in Paris (for the fifth time) last night, and Woody Allen’s script calls for a character to say that Mark Twain is the father of the American novel. I’ll accept that, but I’d like to add a mother to the little family. I’d like to propose that Louisa May Alcott is the mother of the American chick-lit novel.

Louisa May Alcott has long been known as the forerunner of the Young Adult genre of authors we know today. In her time, her popularity was based on the fact that most other writers for children were moralizing and preachy. Her characters resonate with real-life drama — they don’t always behave well, they feel guilty when they misbehave, and they don’t always marry the man of their mama’s dreams.

Are Louisa’s string of novels the archetypes for such popular books as Lisi Harrison’s Clique series?  At first glance, one might be horrified at such a comparison, but let’s extrapolate, applying a little Midnight in Paris – style time travel. If Alcott were alive today, would she embrace Facebook and Twitter and use it for her characters to gossip about each other? She writes with an almost vicious delight at the “mean girl” antics of Meg’s friends and she gets even better at it in An Old-Fashioned Girl. They make the perfect foil for the March sisters who struggle to be “good” while also wanting to enjoy the good life. Only Beth seems immune to peer pressure, but then she doesn’t get out much.

How many times have you read a current novel in which the heroine realizes that the hunky bachelor, while providing social standing and sinful delight, is not the one to settle down with and marry?  Sometimes the heroine even passes off the hunky bachelor to a friend, and that relationship turns out to be a marriage made in heaven. Goodbye Laurie, hello Professor Bhaer.

I need to go on record here that I’m frequently appalled at a lot of what my students read today. I believe that constantly reading about the mean-girl phenomenon legitimizes its inevitability, even though many of the popular books do have heroines with a heart of gold who make the right choice in the end. Unfortunately, I’m afraid that in our drive to present young girls with realistic role-models, we’ve also given them permission to misbehave because “everyone does it.”

But let’s get back to that time travel thingey. Louisa as YA Queen. No wonder people came to her house in Concord and asked for locks of her hair. If she were a modern woman, would she also be appalled? After all, she often called her YA novels rubbish and was kind of embarrassed about them.

Can you see her on The View? What do you think?

P.S. I really struggled with writing to my own prompts, and thus found myself straying off-task. I hope you will forgive me, and I’m looking forward to reading what you have to say!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Book Club: Good Christian Bitches

Image via eonline.com

If it’s got Kristin Chenoweth (Wicked, Glee) in it, it’s got my attention. That’s why I was initially attracted to the new television show premiering on March 4 on ABC. Then I found out it was based on a book and I dialed up my public library to get on the list to check it out.

Image via eonline.com

La divine Chenoweth stars as Carlene Cockburn (in a compilation of characters from the novel), a society maven of one of Dallas’s ritzy neighborhoods, Highland Park Hillside Park. Since I haven’t seen the television show yet, I don’t know how the show will play this change in characterization, but it’s sure to be delightfully naughty.

In the book, the heroine of the piece, Amanda Vaughn, returns to the familiarity and safety of her hometown neighborhood after a nasty separation and impending divorce from her philandering husband. Her two children, not really understanding their mother’s plight, are none too thrilled to be plucked out of their ocean-side home in Newport Beach, California. She is asked to chair the Cattle Baron’s Longhorn Ball after its fundraising efforts for pediatric care have been discredited by the previous chair. Her “good friends” from high school propose this obvious fiasco as a way to drown her failed-marriage sorrows in good works, but their motives are less than charitable — and from thence comes the title. And then there’s the mysterious rich guy…

Apparently the book is a thinly disguised accounting of author Kim Gatlin’s own experience. Only the names have been changed. You should really click into this link and see the discussion, including replies from Kim AND her mother about the book! It’s hysterical.

Although it has garnered lots of controversial press in the Bible Belt, which resulted in a change in the name of the television show from Good Christian Bitches to Good Christian Belles and finally to the sanitized GCB, I’m looking forward to watching the premiere. The book was funny and well-written and in any other socio-political climate would be called the ultimate beach read.

In the comedic hands of Kristin Chenoweth and Annie Potts, who plays Amanda’s mother Gigi, the show has a good chance of being successful. I suggest that you read its inspiration and play the Book 2 Movie game along with me.

I leave you with the best quote I’ve heard this week which my sources tell me comes from Carlene: “Cleavage makes your cross hang straight.”

I hope that Jenners at Life With Books will forgive me for copying her format. It’s so absolutely fabulous that I knew I needed to change my concept — and they say imitation is the highest form of flattery. She reads much more important books than I do, so go over there and check her out.

First Husband Wine

We had book club at our house on Monday night. Book club with our group requires that most of us actually read the book, but there’s also food and wine. On another day I’ll tell you about the fabulous gluten-free dinner we prepared…

When the club left, I noticed that our decent chardonnay had been finished first, followed by the well-rated jug cabernet. Almost all of the jug pinot grigio was gone, too. All that was left was the lonely first husband wine. Even our “mature” drinkers in the group didn’t touch the white zinfandel.

Image

Unless you’re the people who were with me during that fateful tour of the Beringer winery, you probably are scratching your head about “first husband wine.” I have to insert a commercial here, however. The Beringer property in St. Helena is stunningly beautiful, and we had the best tour guide ever.

Image via http://vintnerds.blogspot.com/2011/09/more-blends.html

California White Zinfandel is kind of the step-child of rose wines. French rose makers don’t take it seriously, wine connoisseurs turn their noses up at it, and it’s so cheap to buy that it can’t possibly be any good, right? Yet some people just love it!

And now for the punchline…

Our very funny guide at the winery told us that Beringer White Zinfandel was a “first husband wine” — it needs to be used up while it’s still young and fresh. And then move on to a more mature vintage.

I didn’t say it; don’t shoot the messenger. You have to admit it made you giggle, though.

Apparently I’m okay with it, too. As I type, I’m drinking some of that lonely little bottle as inspiration for this post. 🙂 And darling husband is still on his first wife, 30 years later.

Wordless Wednesday

I know I’m supposed to be embracing where I am today — that carpe diem stuff.

All I really want to do is go on vacation.

Image via frogprop.com

I’m linked up Wordless Wednesday at And Then She Snapped and Live and Love Out Loud and Naptime Momtog. Please stop by and give these bloggers some comment love, too!

The Louisa Challenge: February Prompts

“Sorry you could find nothing better to read. I write that rubbish because it sells, and ordinary people like it.”  ~~ Louisa May Alcott

Image via victoriantradingco.com

Louisa May Alcott was a woman of her time yet manages to remain a contemporary woman of our time. She knew the difference between reality and dreams, and she did what she needed to do to keep her family fed, clothed, and sheltered. In that respect, she isn’t much different from any of us.

Alcott’s best known book, Little Women, still inspires dollhouse dolls, paper dolls, and her childhood home, Orchard House, was celebrated by Department 56 in their Literary Classic Series of porcelain replicas. Given my love of all things Alcott, I’m not quite sure why I don’t own this…

Image via http://www.dept56retirees.com

In 1868, she put aside writing her beloved mysteries and thrillers to write Little Women, which is loosely based on her own family life with her three sisters. After having read Little Women, the Louisa Challenge asks you to respond to one or more of these prompts — or make up your own. There are no rules in this literary challenge!

P.S. There are spoilers here…

  1. Which is your favorite character in Little Women? Why?
  2. Do you find it surprising that once Laurie is rejected by Jo, he falls in love with Amy? Do you feel his characterization is complete and he is acting within the “norm” of the personality Alcott has created for him, or does Alcott simply dispose of him once our heroine rejects him?
  3.  Some critics argue that the characters are masochistic. Meg is the perfect little wife, Amy is the social gold digger, and Beth is the eternally loving and patient woman. Do you believe these characterizations are masochistic? If so, do you think Alcott could have characterized them any other way while maintaining the realism of the society she lived in? And if this is true, what of Jo’s character?
  4.  The last two chapters find Jo setting aside her budding literary career to run a school with her husband. Why do you think Alcott made her strongest feminine figure sacrifice her own life plans for her husband’s?
  5. Do you believe this is a feminine or a feminist piece of work?
  6. Who would you cast in the next movie adaptation?

Join us on Sunday, February 13, as we celebrate Little Women in the Louisa Challenge. I look forward to hearing what you have to say!

Prompts via Lit Lovers

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...